<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Six Degrees Web Design Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-c8ffee21" type="application/json"/><link>http://sixdegreespgh.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://sixdegreespgh.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:43:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-322315997</link><description>For Twitter, you may want to give &lt;a href="http://mentionmapp.com/beta/classic/index.php#user-mentionmapp" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://mentionmapp.com/beta/cl...&lt;/a&gt; a try.  I use it to find new contacts to add to my network that I know I will share common interests with.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Gubbins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:43:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-212620273</link><description>Hi you can visualize Facebook networks at &lt;a href="http://www.touchgraph.com/facebook" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.touchgraph.com/face...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Foulds</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 01:29:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-195028973</link><description>Just like Google map, thanks for info.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toronto Web Design</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:57:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Auto-Post to Facebook</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/01/07/auto-post-to-facebook/#comment-181757202</link><description>I use &lt;a href="http://Ping.fm" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ping.fm&lt;/a&gt; for this purpose</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sheffield Web Designers</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 23:44:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Stirring The Pot With Comments Changes</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/03/01/facebook-stirring-the-pot-with-comments-changes/#comment-168987670</link><description>BTW, I accidentally hit shift-enter and was able to put a space between paragraphs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SixDegreesPGH</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 09:52:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Stirring The Pot With Comments Changes</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/03/01/facebook-stirring-the-pot-with-comments-changes/#comment-166499057</link><description>What about the change in which the return/enter key no longer functions properly to create a line break, but now functions as "post" when commenting on someone else's post or in a group?  Because what FB needed was less readability of comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Elusis</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:12:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spambots &amp;#038; Twitter: Removing Spammers from your Followers</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/22/spambots-twitter/#comment-161165370</link><description>I love @twitblockapp My question is... why do spam bots flood my account? they are just taking up space. yet i never see them tweet. can anyone explain why they exist. Should I enjoy that they enhance my follower list and quit complaining?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Christine McCarthy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2011 00:01:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Stirring The Pot With Comments Changes</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/03/01/facebook-stirring-the-pot-with-comments-changes/#comment-159884379</link><description>Not that I am aware of. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not sure of that. I haven't read their privacy policy since they rewrote it to be clearer. Or maybe that's just their Terms of Service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SixDegreesPGH</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:09:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Stirring The Pot With Comments Changes</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/03/01/facebook-stirring-the-pot-with-comments-changes/#comment-158859710</link><description>Are there any settings to enable that can prevent this?  How does this not violate their own privacy policy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tiffany Harkleroad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 01:36:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-157597163</link><description>Excellent source of information.Thanks for sharing this information with us.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldwidegraphics.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.worldwidegraphics.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Cincinnati Wallpaper</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 04:36:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spambots &amp;#038; Twitter: Removing Spammers from your Followers</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/22/spambots-twitter/#comment-154149628</link><description>I also recommend @TwitCleaner &lt;a href="http://thetwitcleaner.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://thetwitcleaner.com/&lt;/a&gt; - it does not offer mass unfollow; you have to unfollow manually. (But that's the spirit of Twitter: if you don't do mass following, manually unfollowing a few 'dodgy' tweeps is not a big deal.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have found TwitCleaner to be very useful in identifying tweeps who tweet nothing but links, never engage with their followers, tweet nothing but RTs, etc.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW, I'm not affiliated w/ TwitCleaner in any way. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">KseniaCoffman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:12:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-142403532</link><description>I'm so glad you enjoyed my post on LinkedIn InMaps. Thanks so much for the link love!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Whitney Hess</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-141276770</link><description>Good post - and agree that Whitney Hess gives a brilliant overview of InMaps in the post you link to.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are more services coming on-line to collage all your social media connections.  One of them, Connected, I have just reviewed and gives these world/geographical maps.  &lt;a href="http://wp.me/pYnfH-8t" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://wp.me/pYnfH-8t&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bernie Hogan at Oxford University was doing this visualisation (InMaps style) stuff for Facebook last year.  See this story:-&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.connectedaction.net/2010/04/25/bernie-hogans-facebook-social-network-data-provider-and-visualization-toolkit/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.connectedaction.net...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just had a try - and not sure it is working.  If you want to contact him - his details are here.  &lt;a href="http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/?id=140" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people...&lt;/a&gt; - he's a really bright bloke doing research in this area.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil O'Brien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:27:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Linkedin has InMaps, what about Facebook?</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/02/04/linkedin-has-inmaps-what-about-facebook/#comment-141215660</link><description>Great! Thanks for sharing........</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Toronto Website Designer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 07:22:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Rules of Engagement</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/01/26/twitter-rules-of-engagement/#comment-138560800</link><description>Thanks for the reminders on how to behave and display basic good manners. It’s easy for some people to hide behind the veneer of anonymity when using social media. Fortunately, I think most people do take care in their interactions and how they respond on Twitter. The worst offenders of bad online behavior are those who comment anonymously in the world of mass media, especially the news outlets — not sure why so many of them feel the need to spew such venom but glad they don’t bring it to Twitter!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul Biedermann</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 21:39:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Rules of Engagement</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2011/01/26/twitter-rules-of-engagement/#comment-138406283</link><description>I recently commented on another unrelated post how unfortanate it is that  "sometimes we must be reminded of the simplest things". &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is one of those cases. As with other online media, not being able to look someone in the eye on Twitter seems to erase the importance of politeness, friendliness and good old fashioned "consideration" from the Tweeter's consciousness.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe we need a new course in schools to teach people how to engage others online?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">@samfiorella</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 16:28:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding Topics of Interest on Twitter</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/11/28/finding-topics-of-interest-on-twitter/#comment-107904249</link><description>Great post on using hashtags to build movements!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried using twibes but I felt like it detracted from the whole simplicity of hashtags. WTHashtag is awesome but also leaves a lot missing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How can you properly grow a tribe with the tools &amp;amp; hashtags out there?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chase Adams</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:50:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Finding Topics of Interest on Twitter</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/11/28/finding-topics-of-interest-on-twitter/#comment-107903763</link><description>Never heard of #nerdshirtfriday. I will have to follow and submit some photos (esp the ones that my wife won't let me wear anymore cause they are too nerdy :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karl Kovacs</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:49:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #UsGuys Wordle</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/11/29/usguyswordle/#comment-105061267</link><description>The words weren't removed, just the # symbol. Yet it kept the @ symbol on the Twitter IDs. Who knows.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SixDegreesPGH</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 09:55:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: #UsGuys Wordle</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/11/29/usguyswordle/#comment-104987703</link><description>Interesting...I wonder why those names were removed. Oh—I see klout!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paula Lee Bright</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 01:39:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I learned from PodCamp Pittsburgh 5</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/09/19/what-i-learned-from-podcamp-pittsburgh-5/#comment-79468410</link><description>I am glad my presentation of Dragon NaturallySpeaking was helpful, I really enjoyed seeing everyone and appreciate your thoughtful questions. Have a great day and hopefully see you next year at podcamp Camp six
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Greg</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Greg</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:42:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I learned from PodCamp Pittsburgh 5</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/09/19/what-i-learned-from-podcamp-pittsburgh-5/#comment-79321639</link><description>The session where we learned about the #2 point was a great overview on the legal issues. LOTS to think about.  It was nice meeting you yesterday!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">MP</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 17:18:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I learned from PodCamp Pittsburgh 5</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/09/19/what-i-learned-from-podcamp-pittsburgh-5/#comment-79318618</link><description>Thanks for coming! Glad you had a good time :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jennie Roth</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Websites 101: Domain Names</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/06/01/websites-101-domain-names/#comment-69215162</link><description>Yes, I do need to post more. I've been so busy lately I forget to post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:43:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Websites 101: Domain Names</title><link>http://sixdegreeswebdesign.com/blog/2010/06/01/websites-101-domain-names/#comment-69215161</link><description>Hi. I actually enjoyed reading your writing!. Top notch written content. I might recommend you to submit articles a bit more frequently. This way, having such type of a useful site I think you could rank better in the search engines</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pozycjonowanie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:03:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
